By the time the gunner had fired the 85m APCR round the angle was too acute and the round would invariably go skyward (one out of ten resulted in a damaged or, shock horror a destroyed tank). If the tracks were caught and power applied trying to free the vehicle, the smaller gears could be unseated completely, as well. Pop back out to plink another KT, scoot behind cover, rinse-repeat. It can only penetrate them with APHE through the cupola, which is nearly impossible to do beyond 400m. In my opinion, unless the 105 gets what I heard is supposed to be it's real penetration values, (300+mm of pen), Tiger II 105 deserves to go down to 6.7.
The T32 cannot frontally penetrate an IS-6 or T-54 except through the cupola.
I'm pretty sure that is the correct situation. . T34/T29's turret armour may be trolly, but its hull has three hard to miss weak spots at the front, so unless you go hull-down those won't tank well. And again, T34 and T29 have 12.7 mm MG on top to bite at planes overhead. You have an 70 ton vehicle with a hp to weight ratio starting at 10, if you run the engine at 3000 RPMs. DarkHearth, August 25, 2017 in Ground Forces Discussion. Nothing justifies the 105 Tiger sharing the same battle-rating as the IS-6, Centurion Mk10 and the M46, one of them having ridiculously OP armor and generous BR, while 2 others using post-war technology that defeats any armour and gives them opportunity to react to threats faster, (HEATFS, APDS, stabilizer on the Centurion). I'm just barely halfway done spading it and unlike the Jagdtiger (119 games, 82 kills, 105 deaths), I'm already sitting with a … Try replicating that little encounter in CM, result one very dead T-34 and the paint a little bit chipped on one of the King Tigers.
T'was an interesting suggestion DT so I fired up a CMAK scenario, four Tigers v's one Wolverine (could not select a Firefly). Sure, designing a map that allows keyhole shooting might result in a similar result but that was not my point, you cannot simulate the encounter with the CM engine, without radically changing the parameters of the encounter. That was already too high for the Panther. the first t54 will need to hit nex to the hull the other two varients just line your hot with the veritcal slit they will pen and kill gunner/commander if the t54 is looking at you. That had to have led to hasty decisions and deployments. The first few Tiger Is used a 21 liter version of the same engine, all the later models had a marginally improved 24 liter version with 700 hp. Just like the T29 and T34 share the same battle rating. The legend of the Soviet armored forces and the most widely-produced Soviet tank of World War II, with a total of 33,805 vehicles manufactured. Not only they are solid, but they take ages to load. You can shoot lower glacis but it's random + transmission eats shells :). At 3000 RPM the hp to weight for the Panther was 16, at the governed 2500 it was still a respectable 13. Also, although I have not been able to verify the effectiveness of its cannon, the AP standard ammunition seems to offer a better penetration profile than the Tiger's 39/43. I feel a huge difference suddenly when in duels with Tiger2's. The Tiger I was an effective weapons system despite its operational difficulties, because it was so ascendent in gun and armor terms in its heyday in 1943.
It only has 204mm of pen and a lower plate that can be penned by 1.0+ BR lower medium tanks.
If governed under 2500 RPM, you … In 1940 British tank regiments were lucky if half the tanks made it on a 30 mile march, while the halt and the lame caught up later.
The King Tiger had well-sloped armor that was six inches thick on the front hull. apcr to the right side of the turret directly next to the gun will kill gunner.
Published by Gaijin Network Ltd. under the exclusive license. Panthers failed because the gears transmitting power from the engine to the tracks couldn't take it. Although Oskin did not know it at the time, the tank unit was a platoon from spzAbt 501, the first German tank unit on the Eastern Front with Hitler's latest 'wonder weapon', the new King Tiger heavy tank. They also had fuel system problems and oil pressure problems, to be sure. Finally add to the poor reliability and operational mobility a weight that threatened to collapse bridges and a time consuming train/detrain procedure and you really have a complete porker of a weapons system. I think it was the JpzIV that was very front heavy and had a history of poor travel performance. . I've only played the Tiger II H premium but definitely prefer that over the T34 myself.
Your earlier comment still holds good: it isn't just power to weight. Now, as seems obligatory with posters to this forum, I must now issue the standard caveat that this is not an explicit criticism of the game but a reflection on the age of the product and limitations of the operating system that powers the simulation. Given that, is it a case of those on high not understanding or caring about the unreliability (for power political reasons they may not have been able to come at further delays to deployment), or is it a lack of quality in the manufacturing process for the gearbox only?
But while T29 has APHE shells that almost always pop anything they penetrate, T34's solid shots may cause frustration at times. The drive wheel isn't any bigger. At Kursk after a long rest and refit, the 6th Panzer had 105 tanks on its books. With France conquered, the scenario of trench warfare in Northern Europe was no longer applicable and the design was revised by Dr. H.E.
Now you may expect me to write “this never happened”, but it did. The Churchill, for example, having very modest figures, yet being able to deal with unkind terrain that would defeat other tanks. by choosing a spot that only shows its turret and runs away after crippling a tank. IMO, Tiger II H > T34. On the evening of 11 August 1944, Lt. Aleksandr P. Oskin of the 53rd Guards Fastov Tank Brigade (6th Guards Tank Corps) was ordered to patrol the Polish village of Ogledow where he was expected to link up with the unit's 2nd Battalion. By Tiger or T34. These new specifications, for the A22 or Infantry Tank Mark IV, were given to Vauxhall in June 1940.[4]. your first point needs to go with the second there is more ways than one to skin a cat in dealing with the t54's. I'd highly recommend it. The same folks typically cite the high portion of Tigers lost to "destroyed by crew" results as evidence of their tactical greatness. It can at least pen the tanks it faces.
You're arguing that a heavy tank at 7.0 BR that has both a gun and hull on par with that of the IS-2, a 5.7 BR tank, should remain at 7.0 BR, but a 7.0 BR heavy tank that is a 6.7 BR heavy tank with the gun switched out for one of the same caliber as that used by 7.3+ BR heavy tanks should be dropped to 6.7 BR. Usually your T-34/85 gets toasted after killing one King Tiger. The vehicle's drawbacks included an overloaded suspension and engine-transmission group, as well as excessive general mass. (Consider the Ur-myth of killer Tigers at Kursk. This gave it lower mobility than the Panther but more than the Tiger II by a long way. Except the Tiger 105 has ammo racks that can't be removed so one sabot round through the front of the turret can one shot it.. AKA Cent MK10 L7 gun. Plus, Tiger II is a pain to kill with HESH (not from FV4005 obviously) and APDS. The results were impressive, the Tigers churned up dust clouds the Wolverine was unspotted and KO'd the first Tiger, the second collided with the first and was dispatched, the third spotted and fired back..but missed and had a damaged gun. You have an 70 ton vehicle with a hp to weight ratio starting at 10, if you run the engine at 3000 RPMs. The 3 inch gun on the Wolverine needed several hits to kill the Tigers, even side on and a 17 pounder would kill quicker, perhaps allowing all four Tigers to be KO'd. By Many of you have been brought up on World of Tanks may not be aware of a sim that predated it, called T34 vs Tiger. the only tank that can rolf stomp it frontally without worry of being penned is a is-4 which i put to a br compression issue. Now, KT's hull is less vulnerable, but its hull front plate isn't - it's hard to aim at something knowing that if they shoot back right now they will pen. The only one you should struggle against is the IS6. Costard - talk about cherry-picking the article!!!!!! Similar horror stories of losses to mechanical failure on road marches can be found for Tiger Is, notably in Italy (hills and low power to weight mix poorly). he shoudnt be repaired by the time you loaded again unless he has aced crew and you have lost your loader in which case its your falt for not adjusting to your situation.
generally i will agree with that but some maps simply dont allow stealth play in the beginning unless the enemy deploys wrong or doesnt cover some routes..... still thoughmore to you if you can make that work. © 2020 by Gaijin Games Kft.
The unit had disembarked earlier at Kielce with 45 King Tigers but by the time it had reac.hed the vicinity of Ogledow on the evening of 11 August 1944, it was down to only eight tanks. All the same conditions apply, an ambush conducted at close range, the Tigers, unable to spot their tormentor due to the smoke and dust, caused by the engagement, dying. The King Tiger used the engine from the Panther. Possibly because the design brief was originally centred on trench warfare the ability to follow a zig-zag trech system, and not to bog came to the fore. dont forget, it takes ages to stabilize the gun on KT. Short answer: The Centurion is the better tank all round but in a tank v tank duel I reckon 10 King Tigers would be a match for 12–14 Centurions mark 1 or 2 mounting 17 pdr guns.
I mean, the buff to AP is nice and all but at the BR you are fighting in, you'll face dozens of Tiger II's. Personally, I think the T34 is a better tank than the KT II (H).Among some of the reasons I find is the turret armor much stronger, lower profile, has 6 crew members and lacks front axle, making it more difficult to immobilize by frontal shots.
The Churchill was just a smidge shorter than the Tiger II surprising given the way they look. I really do hope the spotting in CM2 will highlight the difficulty of locating stationary targets whilst in a moving vehicle. Because of the decline in heavy tank development after the end of World War II, the T34 never entered service. Why do you even compare it with a Cent Mk10. That's it what makes it competitive. When engaging enemy vehicles at long range, the Tiger II had an upper hand over any other vehicle in terms of the gun and armor protection. most tanks at 6.7 can pull this off and some below that so you should alerady expect all tanks to do this and be prepared for it. Perhaps it is worth trying to see if the CMAK engine performs better on restricting spotting. They are also much more versatile and resistant to uptiers. The whole point of the T32 is to have the armor to take shots, otherwise, its slower and takes longer to return fire.
. [4], Initially specified prior to the outbreak of the Second World War the (General Staff designation) A20 was to be the replacement for the. They made up for it by lavishing attention on them and limiting their time in action (or employing active companies while rotating others out of action etc). "Just use APCR" on a gun with 20 second reload against a target that's almost 100% sloped armor. It isn't just power to weight. The most heavily armored tank carrying the most powerful anti-tank gun. http://www.battlefield.ru/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=282&Itemid=123〈=en. You are exactly right.
.
Axis P1367 Eu, Lift Up Gym Ltd, Mit Relativity, Prisoners Netflix 2018, Integrated Information Theory Book, La Muscle Ashwagandha, Does Wolverine Love Rogue, Konomi Suzuki Redo Spotify, 2018 Election Results Cnn, Weider Pro 265 Standard Weight Bench And Weight Combo Pack, Discretization Methods In Cfd, The Isle Evrima New Dinosaurs, San Marco Restaurants Jacksonville, Fl, Ultraedit Crack, The Life-changing Magic Of Tidying Up Epub Vk, Baldur's Gate Metacritic, Human Female Noble, Talk Like A Pirate Day Song, Mcafee Endpoint Security Review, Journey Of A Genius, Minute Key Designs, Fitness First Rates With Instructor, Vikings Super Bowl Record, Www Surrey Acuk, How Do I Remove Webroot Security From My Mac, Stone Harbor Events 2020, Marc Ecko Getting Up Playstation Store, The Mathematical Theory Of Black Holes Pdf, N-ethylmaleimide Sds, Yo Pecador Oración Antigua, Mariah Guaynaa Instagram, Conformal Cyclic Cosmology 2019, Jd Gyms Nhs Discount, Baldur's Gate Realms, 16 Queen Problem Solution, Gold's Gym Xrs 20 Olympic Workout Bench Canada, What Does The Bible Say About Foot Washing, Cavan Crystal Hotel Email,