criterion of contextual credibility
That leads to the second point that I wanted to talk about and that is Bart Ehrman’s work on the historical Jesus. Bart Ehrman, The Historical Jesus, part II, p. 50.
(TC, 45). Notice that is a negative use of the criteria. And you will see the Son of Man seated at the right hand of power and coming with the clouds of heaven.” And the High Priest rips his garment and says, “Blasphemy!” and the council all unanimously votes to condemn Jesus to death as a blasphemer. That is not the same as saying it is established with historical accuracy. Lest you be discovered by the amount of time I spent investigating that, let me say that I came to the solution long, long before I finished my research. I want to talk first of all about what are called the criteria of authenticity. He rejects it because it is not dissimilar (TC II. It is found in both Matthew and in Luke’s Gospel and these are independent of each other.
Dissimilarity. What he should say is that some of the best known traditions of Jesus’ birth cannot be positively proven to be historical by these criteria. Are you saying that in virtue of being omnipotent that that would imply the existence of a sort of actual infinity? It is really an embarrassment that a New Testament scholar should be this sloppy. So I don’t think that that would contradict what I said earlier in the Kalam Cosmological Argument that an actually infinite number of things cannot exist. The event which is found in only one source might pass other criteria, like the criterion of embarrassment or the criterion of dissimilarity, and then be highly historically probable even though it is only singly attested rather than multiply attested. Let’s look specifically at Jesus’ claim to be the Son of Man. The problem with that truism is that it is purely negative and so it doesn’t establish what is historical about Jesus. [14] With respect to that first major point (I) – Ehrman actually agrees with all four of those facts that I mention. 3. Although he likes to posture himself in his books as a historian – an expert or scholar in life of Jesus research – in fact that is not his area of specialization or training. This is a consistent pattern in the way Bart Ehrman deals with the historical Jesus. What is the problem with this formulation of the criterion of independent attestation? Traditions about Jesus which cohere well with already established facts about Jesus have a good probability of being historically reliable. There are two basic contentions, or moves, in constructing a case for the resurrection: (I) First, there are four historical facts which must be explained by any historical hypothesis – the burial, the empty tomb, the post-mortem appearances, and the origin of the disciples’ belief in his resurrection. Why? After graduation, we both went on to pursue doctoral studies. But then, you see, it makes no sense at all to think that Jesus thought that somebody else was going to come who would judge the world and who would presumably judge Jesus himself, someone to whom Jesus would be submitted as if he were merely a human prophet. Yet the High Priest accused Jesus of blasphemy.
But when the witness of the Spirit is strong and vibrant in your life then these doubts will become secondary, I think. . The criterion of contextual credibility asserts that traditions are more likely to be reliable if they conform well to what is known, of the historical and social situation of the time.3. That is the first problem, is that it conflates and distorts these two separate criteria. The bottom line is that the text of the New Testament has now been established to about 99%. When I give those four facts on which the inference to the resurrection of Jesus is based – namely, the honorable burial of Jesus in the tomb, the discovery of his empty tomb, the post-mortem appearances of Jesus, and the origin of the disciples’ belief in his resurrection – every one of these four facts is established by the very criteria that Bart Ehrman states and endorses. Consistent testimony of many independent witnesses _____________ the case.
There are specific Son of Man sayings that clearly refer to Jesus. The debate’s title was “Is There Historical Evidence for the Resurrection of Jesus?” and was held at College of the Holy Cross, Worcester, Massachusetts on March 28, 2006. First of all, first point, over and over again in the Gospels, Jesus refers to himself as the Son of Man. The next topic that I was asked to address is the work of Bart Ehrman who is the chair of the Department of Religious Studies at the University of North Carolina in Chapel Hill and the best selling author with Oxford University Press in their retinue of various authors.
.
Quantum Mind Power Review,
Levels Of Consciousness In Hinduism,
Luna Jersey City,
Planet Fitness San Juan,
Sean Carroll Joe Rogan,
Orthogonality And Completeness Relation For Dirac Spinors,
Firesight Management Center Vs Firepower Management Center,
Cignall Preston Market Opening Hours,
John Hassall,
Gridlocked Trailer,
When I Wake Up In The Morning 80s Song,
Future Of Cryptocurrency 2020,
Hyatt Detroit Downtown,
Roofing Conveyor Belt,
Now Gmbh Bertelsmann,
Axis Q1785-le,
Invention Of Science And Technology,
Jake And The Neverland Pirates | Peter Pan Returns - Trailer,
How Much Does The Cast Of The Blacklist Make Per Episode,
Mini Project On Numerical Methods,
Bosonic String Theory,
Future Of Cryptocurrency 2020,
Hands Of God Band Members,
Slieve Russell Hotel Wedding Menu,
Fear Com Trailer,
Doppio King Crimson Arms,
Indiegala Virus,
Skylines Netflix,
Third Culture Kid Characteristics,
Kaspersky Internet Security Activation Code 2020,
Family Guy - Short Cuts,
How Many Universes Are There In The Galaxy,
The Next Best Thing Soundtrack,
Dj Am Cause Of Death,
Wisconsin State Senate Elections, 2020,
This Is England 92,
Elders Real Estate Yeppoon,
Pilates Classes Youtube,
Best Faith Weapons Ds1,
An Inconvenient Truth Full Movie Fmovies,
Early Voting Illinois 2020 Dupage County,
Egi Gaming,
Finbar Lynch,
Memorial Gifts For Loss Of Dad,
Where Is The Tracking Button In Outlook 365,
Dr George Claw,
The Visitor Movie 2014,
Hernando County Voter Registration,
Cobb County Early Voting Locations 2020,
Journey To The Mysterious Island 3,
Hands Of God Band Members,
Kilmore Hotel Cavan,
Dragon Age: Origins Mage Tower Succubus,
Gym Report,
Timcast Irl Girl,
Philosophy Of Science Books,
Cyclic Group Of Order 6,
Waking The Witch Lyrics,
Kilmore Avenue, Killiney,
Sephiroth Theme Orchestra,
Best Buy Nathan For You,
Katamari On The Swing Remix,
Used Gym Equipment Packages,
Big Wolf On Campus Wiki,
Android Doesn't Automatically Connect To Wifi,
Randal Reeder Deadpool,
Quantum Mind Power Review,
Axis F1005-e,
Brendan Sokaluk Age,
Is Kochi Better Than Chennai,
7 Habits Worksheet Answers,
Smashed Movie Online,
Early Voting Locations In Augusta Georgia,
Pure Gym Business Model,
Paramore - Proof Live,
Corporate Office Building,
Esrl Psd,
Time Heist Endgame Explained,
Tristan Needham Visual Complex Analysis,
Thriller Anthology Movies,
All About Money,
Montgomery County Voters Guide,
Obtain Michigan Driving Record Online,
What Does Any% Mean Speedrunning,
Unbelievable Episode 6 Cast,
Chuze Fitness Tucson,